Done-for-you AI workflows vs a visual DIY automation platform
Scribe.sg vs Make
Make (formerly Integromat) is a genuinely powerful visual platform — its scenario builder handles complex, branching automations that go well beyond simple triggers. It rewards people who like to build. The question is whether building and maintaining scenarios is work you want to own.
Scribe.sg
Scribe.sg hands the building and the upkeep to us. We design your AI workflows on your real data, run them, monitor every execution, and adapt them as your business changes — all included.
Make
Make gives you a deep visual canvas to build sophisticated scenarios yourself. It's powerful and granular, and the design, testing, and maintenance sit with whoever builds it on your side.
Side by side
| Capability | Scribe.sg | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Who builds it | We do — by hand, on your real data. | Your team does, in the Make builder. |
| Who maintains it | We do — monitored, retried, and fixed for you. | You do — you own breakages and upkeep. |
| Pricing model | Usage + a fixed fee for a dedicated developer. | Subscription by task/operation volume. |
| Skill needed on your side | None — you describe the work and approve outputs. | Someone comfortable building and debugging automations. |
| AI judgement in the flow | Custom agents trained on your tone, docs, and rules. | AI steps available; you design and tune the prompts. |
| Human-in-the-loop approvals | Built into every workflow, web or Telegram. | Possible to assemble with extra steps. |
| When something changes | We adjust it — included in your monthly fee. | You update and re-test the automation yourself. |
Who builds it
Scribe.sg: We do — by hand, on your real data.
Make: Your team does, in the Make builder.
Who maintains it
Scribe.sg: We do — monitored, retried, and fixed for you.
Make: You do — you own breakages and upkeep.
Pricing model
Scribe.sg: Usage + a fixed fee for a dedicated developer.
Make: Subscription by task/operation volume.
Skill needed on your side
Scribe.sg: None — you describe the work and approve outputs.
Make: Someone comfortable building and debugging automations.
AI judgement in the flow
Scribe.sg: Custom agents trained on your tone, docs, and rules.
Make: AI steps available; you design and tune the prompts.
Human-in-the-loop approvals
Scribe.sg: Built into every workflow, web or Telegram.
Make: Possible to assemble with extra steps.
When something changes
Scribe.sg: We adjust it — included in your monthly fee.
Make: You update and re-test the automation yourself.
Which should you choose?
Make is the better fit when…
Make is the better fit if you have a builder who wants fine-grained control over complex logic and is happy to own the scenarios, the testing, and the maintenance over time.
Scribe.sg is the better fit when…
Scribe.sg is the better fit if you want the outcome without owning the build — especially where workflows need AI judgement on documents and messages, and someone watching them so they don't quietly break.
Common questions
Make is very powerful — can Scribe.sg handle complex logic too?
Yes. Scribe.sg runs a real workflow engine with branching, loops, conditions, parallel steps, and AI agents in the middle. The difference is that we build and maintain that complexity for you instead of handing you the canvas.
Do I lose flexibility by not building it myself?
You keep the flexibility, you just don't do the work. Changes — new rules, new branches, new integrations — are included in your monthly fee, so the workflow keeps evolving without you touching a builder.
Buy back your time
Prefer to have it done for you?
Book a 30-minute call. Tell us what you'd automate and we'll tell you straight whether Scribe.sg is the right fit — or whether DIY is.
30 minutes, no obligation — we reply within one business day.